A Review of Educational Interventions on Physicians’ Exercise Counseling and Prescription Practices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Context Physicians report various barriers to providing patients with physical activity (PA) counseling and prescriptions. Implementing educational interventions among physicians could be an effective method for the promotion of PA counseling in primary care. Objective The purpose of this study was to review the impact and efficacy of different educational intervention modalities on physicians’ PA promotion outcomes. Design Twenty-one articles were included in this systematic review and were of moderate quality (6.8 ± 3.3 of 14 controlled trials and 6.3 ± 2.3 of 12 uncontrolled trials), assessed via the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. Studies ranged in sample size from 9 to 12,945 participants ( n = 16,283). Eligibility Criteria For inclusion, studies had to have had interventional experimental design and performed an educational intervention aiming to improve PA counseling or exercise prescription practice, and most of the sample comprised physicians. Study Selection Sources were searched in May 2022 ( n = 3422 citations without duplicates) via Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier (Prospero ID: CRD42022331755). Main Outcome Measures Physician PA practice outcomes across studies were categorized in terms of frequency of counseling and prescription, knowledge, and confidence. Results Most studies measuring PA counseling (8 of 13 studies) and prescription practices (8 of 10 studies) exhibited an increased frequency of PA prescription before and after the intervention. Physician confidence surrounding PA increased in most studies (10 of 12 studies), as well as knowledge of PA (6 of 7 studies). Conclusions Studies that were most effective in increasing physician PA promotion outcomes incorporated a practical component (i.e., hands-on) in addition to a theoretical session (i.e., lecture-based) to meet specific goals (e.g., accredited PA guidelines, prescription strategies). This review outlines the strengths and weaknesses of present educational intervention modalities and provides insight into future directions for education models to promote PA counseling and exercise prescription practices among physicians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".