MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390536225 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3800566/v1

The invisible enemy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal smokeless tobacco use as a risk factor for low birth weight

2024· review· en· W4390536225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Akanksha Mahajan, Bhawna Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmokeless tobaccoMedicineLow birth weightSnuffBirth weightCohort studyPregnancyObservational studyEnvironmental healthPopulationTobacco useInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Smokeless tobacco use is a growing public health concern, with potential adverse implications for foetal outcomes if consumed during pregnancy. Birth weight is an important predictive measure for health outcomes of a child throughout their lifespan, from infancy through to adulthood. Although the association between maternal smoking and reduction in birth weight of infants has been studied extensively, it is unclear whether smokeless tobacco has similar effects. Hence, this review was conducted to determine whether an association exists between maternal smokeless tobacco consumption during pregnancy and birth weight of infants. Aims and Methods Systematic literature search was performed in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL with no restrictions on language or time until January 2023. All observational studies (case control, cohort and cross sectional) that examined the relationship between maternal smokeless tobacco use and low birth weight of infants were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Results Thirty-one studies were eligible for the review, including twenty-seven cohort studies, two case-control and two cross-sectional studies. These studies examined various forms of smokeless tobacco use including khat, betel/areca nut, mishri, snuff, iqmik and pituri. A statistically significant association between use of smokeless tobacco and low birth weight was reported in thirteen studies. An additional eleven studies reported a statistically significant reduction in mean birth weight in maternal smokeless tobacco users. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that there was a statistically significant association (OR = 1.91 [1.38, 2.65], P < 0.00001); between maternal smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy and low birth weight. Subgroup analysis found a significant association between maternal mishri consumption during pregnancy and low birth weight (OR = 10.98 [2.03, 59.34], P < 0.05), but not betel nut, betel quid or khat. Conclusions This review found that there is a significant association between maternal smokeless tobacco use and low birth weight of infants, as well as reduction in mean birth weight independent of confounding variables. It is suggested that maternal use of smokeless tobacco should receive specific attention as a part of routine prenatal care. Implications The results of this study highlight the need for further preventive public health campaigns to create awareness about the detrimental effects of smokeless tobacco on foetal outcomes patient education by healthcare workers in the primary care setting will aid in promoting smokeless tobacco cessation prior to pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.026
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.243
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicSmoking Behavior and Cessation→French-language works237,207→