Dual nomenclature in organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts II: <i>Spiniferites elongatus</i> and <i>S. membranaceus</i> , and their equivalent non-fossil species <i>Gonyaulax ovum</i> comb. nov. and <i>G. lewisiae</i> sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cyst-defined extant Spiniferites elongatus Reid Citation1974 and Spiniferites membranaceus (Rossignol Citation1964) Sarjeant Citation1970 are environmentally significant fossil-species of the Quaternary, the former often dominating polar and subpolar assemblages. Following cyst incubation experiments and the establishment of cultures, these species were emended to incorporate information on their motile stages, and transferred to the non-fossil genus Gonyaulax Diesing Citation1866, as Gonyaulax elongata (Reid Citation1974) Ellegaard et al. Citation2003 and Gonyaulax membranacea (Rossignol Citation1964) Ellegaard et al. Citation2003. This unified approach to dinoflagellate nomenclature severs an important link with the fossil-genus Spiniferites Mantell Citation1850. We have applied dual nomenclature, as sanctioned by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants, in returning these species to their previous assignments as Spiniferites elongatus and Spiniferites membranaceus, and we propose Gonyaulax ovum (Gaarder Citation1954) comb. nov., emend. and Gonyaulax lewisiae sp. nov., respectively, as their equivalent non-fossil species. A distinctive morphotype initially described as Rottnestia amphicavata var. amphicavata Dobell & Norris in Harland et al. Citation1980 is proposed as Spiniferites elongatus forma amphicavata stat. nov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".