MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P0687 CHARACTERIZATION OF HEIGHT AND WEIGHT PATTERNS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED CHILDREN WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD)

2004· article· en· W4390567684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marian Pfefferkorn, Jeffrey S. Hyams, James Markowitz, Anne M. Griffiths, Joanne Daggy, Athos Bousvaros, J. Fernando del Rosario, Jonathan Evans, Richard J. Grand, A. Katz, Subra Kugathasan, David R. Mack, Adam Mezoff, Maria Oliva‐Hemker, Anthony Otley, Joel R. Rosh, Robert Rothbaum, V. Tolia, William R. Treem, Robert Wyllie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatric gastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseasePediatric researchFamily medicinePediatricsDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Growth failure complicates the course of up to 40% of pediatric patients with IBD. AIM: To characterize growth and factors affecting growth in newly diagnosed children with Crohn disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Newly diagnosed patients from 18 US/Canadian centers were prospectively enrolled in an observational registry as of January 2002. Data on patients with 1-year follow-up were analyzed. Results: Among 33 Tanner 1–3 patients (mean age 10.4 yrs, 23 male, 27 CD, 6 UC), 9 (27%) (mean age 9.6 yrs, 8 CD, 1 UC) had growth delay (decrease in height-for-age % at diagnosis compared to pre-diagnosis height %). None of the patients who demonstrated growth delay had a BMI< 3%. The 1 patient with UC returned to pre-diagnosis height percentile by the 1st quarter, while all CD patients remained 1–3 channels below their pre-diagnosis height % at the 4th quarter. 7/24 (29%) (6 CD, 1 UC) without growth delay at diagnosis demonstrated a 1-channel decrease in height % by the 4th quarter. No difference was found in the PCDAI at diagnosis for those with (n=8) or without (n=19) growth delay, mean PCDAI =33.8 ± 6.3 vs. 36 ± 19.4 respectively, p=0.9. 6/33 (18%) were malnourished (BMI or weight/length <3%) at diagnosis, all of whom had CD. Malnutrition corrected by the 1st quarter in 4/6 patients. At 1 year, 1 patient remained malnourished; data were not available for the 2nd patient. PCDAI was significantly lower in patients with BMI>3% (mean=31.3 ± 14) than in malnourished patients (mean=49.6 ± 18), p=0.03. Albumin at diagnosis did not differ significantly between those with BMI>3% (mean=3.2) and those with BMI<3% (mean=2.6), p=0.12. Prednisone was used in 27/33 (82%) patients, including the 6 CD patients who were malnourished, 1 of whom remained malnourished throughout the 1-year follow-up period in spite of 2 courses of prednisone therapy. Conclusion: Almost 30% of IBD patients have growth impairment at diagnosis and catch-up growth is not usually seen 1 year later. An additional 29% of children with IBD with normal growth at diagnosis experience decreased growth velocity following diagnosis and start of therapy. Growth abnormalities continue to be a significant problem in this population suggesting new therapeutic strategies may be needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionSame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207