MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P0029 PP PROBIOTICS REDUCE COLONIC HYPERPLASIA AND MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION FOLLOWING CITROBACTER RODENTIUM INFECTION OF MICE

2004· article· en· W4390568849 on OpenAlexaff
Kathene C. Johnson‐Henry, David J. Mitchell, Esther Galindo‐Mata, Nicola L. Jones, Philip M. Sherman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSick childMedicineUniversity hospitalSick building syndromeCitrobacter rodentiumOriginal researchGerontologyFamily medicineLibrary sciencePediatricsInternal medicineInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: C. rodentium is a murine pathogen in mice, which causes both attaching and effacing lesions and colonic hyperplasia in infected mice. The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of a live probiotic mixture of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. acidophilus (Lacidofil®), and to delineate the protective abilities of these probiotics against C. rodentium-induced changes in the colonic mucosa. Methods: Forty female C57BL/6 mice were divided into 5 groups: group A (N=5) was fed sterile water; group B (N=5) administered probiotics (109 CFU/ml) in sterile drinking water; group C (N=5) was fed maltodextrin alone in sterile drinking water; group D (N=5) was challenged orogastrically with C. rodentium (107 CFU/0.1ml) and then fed sterile water; group E (N=10) was pre-treated with maltodextrin in drinking water for one week prior to C. rodentium challenge; and group F (N=10) was pre-treated with probiotics (109 CFU/ml) for one week prior to challenge with C. rodentium. C. rodentium colonization was determined by plating rectal swabs and luminal contents onto McConkey agar plates. At sacrifice, 10 days after infection, colonic tissues were collected for histology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: Treatment with a mixture of viable probiotics reduced the severity of colonic colonization with C. rodentium, prevented C. rodentium-induced colonic hyperplasia (crypt height of infected group = 212 +/− 8.5mum: crypt height of treated group = 131 +/− 8.4mum; ANOVA p<0.001) and decreased bacterial internalization and cellular damage caused by C. rodentium infection. Conclusion: Viable probiotics provide a safe intervention for reducing the sequelae of C. rodentium infection in mice. Understanding the mechanism of action underlying these beneficial effects will set the stage for determining the efficacy of probiotics in preventing infection by other attaching-effacing enteric pathogens, including enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207