Disentangled Representation Learning for Controllable Person Image Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel framework named DRL-CPG to learn disentangled latent representation for controllable person image generation, which can produce realistic person images with desired poses and human attributes (e.g. pose, head, upper clothes, and pants) provided by various source persons. Unlike the existing works leveraging the semantic masks to obtain the representation of each component, we propose to generate disentangled latent code via a novel attribute encoder with transformers trained in a manner of curriculum learning from a relatively easy step to a gradually hard one. A random component mask-agnostic strategy is introduced to randomly remove component masks from the person segmentation masks, which aims at increasing the difficulty of training and promoting the transformer encoder to recognize the underlying boundaries between each component. This enables the model to transfer both the shape and texture of the components. Furthermore, we propose a novel attribute decoder network to integrate multi-level attributes (e.g. the structure feature and the attribute representation) with well-designed Dual Adaptive Denormalization (DAD) residual blocks. Extensive experiments strongly demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to transfer both the texture and shape of different human parts and yield realistic results. To our knowledge, we are the first to learn disentangled latent representations with transformers for person image generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".