MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390585850 · doi:10.1177/14604086231221704

A cadaveric study and clinical application of the free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap reconstruction of limb soft tissue defects

2024· article· en· W4390585850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrauma · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCadaveric spasmScarsCircumflexSurgeryCadaverSoft tissueFree flapPeroneal ArteryVeinGroinAnatomySuperficial veinAnastomosisArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction In recent decades the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap technique has gradually overcome the previous disadvantages of its pedicle and donor site to be widely applied in treating tissue's defects. This article investigates the vascular anatomy of the SCIP flap and evaluates the result of using the flap to reconstruct limb defects. Materials and Methods The study was performed in two parts. Firstly a cross-sectional descriptive anatomical study comprising 49 groin dissections in 25 cadavers, with contrast radiographic demonstration of the vascular anatomy. Secondly a retrospective case series of 51 free SCIP flaps in 49 patients. Surgical outcomes were evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale on the regional function and the aesthetics of implanted flap and donor sites. Results The results of anatomical analysis on cadavers showed the superficial circumflex iliac arteries were detected in all specimens with an average diameter of 1.4 ± 0.3 mm. The superficial subcutaneous venous systems were also recorded, including two veins (superficial circumflex vein and superficial epigastric vein) in 79.5% with an average diameter of 2.3 ± 0.6 mm. The flap results showed the alive flap rate was 90.2%, partial-necrosis flap was 3.9% and total necrosis of the flap in 5.9%. In the aesthetic evaluation, fine line scars were seen in 13/51 cases (25.5%), stretch scars in 33/51 cases (64.7%) and hypertrophic scars in 5/51 patients (9.8%), with no cases of keloid scars. Conclusion The SCIP flap is a reliable free-tissue transfer for reconstructing limb soft tissue defects. Moreover, the SCIP flap is an ideal flap with pleasing aesthetics because the donor-site scar is situated in a well-hidden site. Care must be taken when vein grafts are used to lengthen the flap as flap necrosis rates increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it