Strain-rate-dependent behavior of additively manufactured alumina ceramics: Characterization and mechanical testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study experimentally investigates the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured (AM) alumina ceramics by stereolithography technique. The AM alumina specimens with two different printing orientations (POs) are tested under quasi-static and dynamic loading rates. The material shows a quasi-static (i.e., a strain rate of 10−3 s−1) compressive strength of 1640.54 ± 99.33 MPa and 1494.25 ± 260.08 MPa for the PO1 and PO2, respectively, and a dynamic (i.e., a strain rate of 640-730 s−1) compressive strength of 3077.25 ± 174.07 MPa and 3107.33 ± 97.03 MPa for the PO1 and PO2, respectively, which are among the highest reported values for AM alumina due to the higher density and finer grain size. The strain-rate-dependent compressive strength of the material is slightly affected by the PO which is alleviated with the increase in strain rate from quasi-static to dynamic loading conditions. In contrast, the PO noticeably affects the macro-scale failure pattern. The fractography analysis shows the dominant contribution of the intergranular failure mechanism and a combination of intergranular and transgranular mechanisms under quasi-static and dynamic loading, respectively. The crack speed propagation is found to be 785 ± 174 m/s on average which is ∼ 68% less than that of conventional ones in the literature. The current AM alumina shows a hardness of 24.45 ± 0.88 GPa which is higher than that of the majority of other AM alumina. Overall, this study discusses the potentiality of using AM ceramics in engineering fields replacing the conventionally-made counterparts, and provides implications for designing better-performing AM ceramics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".