MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390590492 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2024.106555

Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of molybdenum using a nitrogen build atmosphere

2024· article· en· W4390590492 on OpenAlexafffund
T. S. Ramakrishnan, E.R.L. Espiritu, Sunyong Kwon, Mohsen K. Keshavarz, José Alberto Muñiz-Lerma, Raynald Gauvin, Mathieu Brochu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostructureMolybdenumAtmosphere (unit)Grain boundaryOxideReducing atmosphereNitrogenMetallurgyArgonComposite materialThermodynamicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method was developed to suppress the crack formation during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of molybdenum (Mo). The method uses a nitrogen (N2) atmosphere to fabricate crack-free samples without any additional processing. To compare with the effect of the N2 atmosphere, samples were prepared under an argon (Ar) atmosphere as well with the same process parameters. The microstructure analyses by optical and high-resolution electron microscopy revealed that crack-free samples were produced under this condition, whereas grain boundary cracks were observed throughout the sample fabricated in Ar atmosphere. To understand the mechanism of crack prevention by nitrogen (N), the energetics of solute components in the BCC-Mo structure were studied by Density Functional Theory (DFT). The theoretical calculations showed that the introduction of N into the BCC-Mo hinders oxygen (O) diffusion, causing O entrapment in the lattice at interstitial positions. As a result, reduced oxides within grains and at grain boundaries (GB) were observed. The results are consistent with the experimental observation made from the fracture surface investigation. The reduced embrittlement of GB from the reduced GB oxide formation is believed to suppress GB cracking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard MaterialsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207