MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390599970 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v6i2.42221

LEVERAGING DIGITAL WORKFLOWS TO TRANSITION THE ORTHOTICS AND PROSTHETICS PROFESSION TOWARD A CLIENT-CENTRIC AND VALUES-BASED CARE MODEL

2024· article· en· W4390599970 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Christopher F. Hovorka

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReimbursementWorkflowValue propositionOrthoticsSustainabilityHealth careScope of practiceBusinessValue (mathematics)Knowledge managementPublic relationsMedicineComputer sciencePhysical therapyMarketingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) profession has a history of responding to market demands in a reactive rather than proactive manner. This has created significant impacts including shrinkage in scope of practice and constraint in remuneration for professional services due to a fee-for-device third party payer system. Rapid changes in technology and healthcare combined with an outdated device-centric reimbursement system are creating unprecedented challenges that threaten sustainability of the O&P profession. Hence, a reassessment of the value of O&P care, and the O&P workflow process is necessary to inform an update to the value proposition and practice model for sustainability. This article reviews key factors contributing to the current state of O&P, and potential solutions involving an update in practitioner competencies, and the care delivery model (from device-centric to client-centric and values-based). Updates could be achieved by leveraging the use of digital workflows that increase efficiencies and enhance the value of clinical outcomes. Eventually, these updates could enable the O&P profession to elevate the value proposition that aligns with its most important stakeholders: client-patients and third-party reimbursement agencies in a rapidly changing technology and healthcare landscape. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/42221/32301 How To Cite: Hovorka C.F. Leveraging digital workflows to transition the Orthotics and Prosthetics profession toward a client-centric and values-based care model. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2023; Volume 6, Issue 2, No.6. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i2.42221 Corresponding Author: Christopher F. Hovorka, PhD, CPO, FAAOPCenter for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.E-Mail: hovorkac@gmail.comORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7147-3134

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0200.018
Open science0.0030.016
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207