MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390611379 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1354723

Editorial: Glycans: molecules at the interface of immunity and disease

2024· editorial· en· W4390611379 on OpenAlexaff
Stevan A. Springer, Shoib Sawar Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunityGlycanMedicineCancer immunotherapyImmunologyImmunotherapyDiseaseBiologyImmune systemInternal medicineGlycoproteinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycans: molecules at the interface of immunity and diseaseBiomolecules are evolved machines.The chemical properties of proteins, lipids and nucleotides are manifestly suited to their essential functions (1).What, then, is the intrinsic function of glycans?Organisms use sugars in such variety; could there be any one role that optimizes the use of glycans' inherently diverse structures and chemistry?If nucleotide polymers are 'for' information storage and proteins are 'for' catalysis, we suggest that glycans are for context -they extend and modify biochemical capability.Glycans enhance life's patterning systems; their finely regulated and contextdependent functions augment processes that require diversity and precision (2).This Research Topic collects research on immunity and disease, where glycans' diverse structures and functions contextualize and enact responses to illness and infection.The articles in this Research Topic illustrate glycans' many biological functions, fine-tuned localization and regulation, diverse structures and synthesis, and varied evolutionary history.Understanding patterns that glycans enact and how these patterns respond to organismal state is central to a complete and nuanced picture of immunity and to targeted disease interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Immunology→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→