Two-cycles in the Infinite Exponential Tower
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The infinite exponential tower is studied through the associated iteration c₁ = 0 and cₙ₊₁ = eᶜₙ λ, for complex λ. For a subset of λ values, the sequence displays stable 2-cycles, that is to say as n → ∞ we observe that the odd subsequence c₂ₙ₋₁ → A whereas the even subsequence c₂ₙ → B, with A ≠ B. Thus, A and B obey B=eᴬ λ and A = eᴮ λ. Numerical investigations of the 2-cycles use a further transformation ζexp(-ζ) = λ = ln(z) and the set of ζ values corresponding to 2-cycles has a curious shape, reminding us of pictures of insect larva; the region has sharply scalloped edges. This paper gives an analytic expression for the edges of the 2-cycle region and a complete explanation of the cusps on the boundary that give the scalloped look.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it