La connaissance de soi : un engagement pédagogique face aux néo-barbaries socio-environnementales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente un paradigme de la transdisciplinarité mis en lien avec les fondements d’une éducation environnementale basée sur la notion de « connaissance de soi ». Nous exposons ainsi une pédagogie complexe à partir de la reconnaissance de la multidimensionnalité de l'être humain, selon une approche de formation envisagée de manière intégrale. Pour cela, nous mobilisons certaines approches de l'autoformation à partir de la connaissance de soi, impliquant également des éléments d’hétéro et d'éco-formation, des prises de conscience et des recherches d’action. Il s'agit donc de partager des éléments réflexifs sur la mobilisation de la conscience de soi dans des pratiques formatives en éducation environnementale et d'étudier comment cet exercice génère un engagement pédagogique face à diverses barbaries grandissantes dans notre époque de l’Anthropocène, avec un accent particulier concernant le panterrorisme et le transhumanisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".