MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tracing the Source Population of Asian Giant Hornet Caught in Nanaimo, Canada

2024· preprint· en· W4390655652 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. B. Freeman, Xuhua Xia

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeographyPhylogeographyPopulationChinaFlywayEast AsiaPhylogenetic treeBiologyEcologyHabitatArchaeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asian giant hornet, Vespa mandarinia, is an invasive species that could potentially destroy local honeybee industry in North America. It has been observed to nest in the coastal regions of British Columbia in Canada and Washington State in USA. What is the source population of the immigrant hornets? The identification of the source population can not only shed light on the route of immigration, but also on the similarity between the native habitat and the potential new habitat in the Pacific Northwest. We analyzed mitochondrial COX1 sequences of specimens sampled from multiple populations in China, South Korea, Japan and the Russian Far East. V. mandarinia exhibits phylogeographic patterns, forming monophyletic clades for 16 specimens from China, six specimens from South Korea and two specimens from Japan. The two mitochondrial COX1 sequences from Nanaimo, British Columbia are identical to the two sequences from Japan. The COX1 sequence from Blaine, Washington State, clustered with those from South Korea, and is identical to one sequence from South Korea (GenBank accession MN716828). Our geophylogeny, which allows visualization of genetic variation over time and space, provides evolutionary insights on the evolution and speciation of three closely related vespine species (V. tropica, V. soror and V. mandarinia). The geophylogeny also highlights a strong insufficiency in sample collection in China. The existing sequenced specimens from mainland China with geographic coordinates were represent only four provinces, missing populations along the coastal regions in East China. One therefore cannot exclude the possibility that the Asian giant hornet found in Canada and USA may also be identical to V. mandarinia in Eastern China. We strongly recommend more extensive DNA barcoding data with geographic information and longer DNA barcode (e.g., the entire mitochondrial genome) so that critical questions on invasive species and environmental conservation can be addressed more accurately than what is possible with existing data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207