A Neural Network for High-Precise and Well-Interpretable Electrocardiogram Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Manual heart disease diagnosis with the electrocardiogram (ECG) is intractable due to the intertwined signal features and lengthy diagnosis procedure, especially for the 24-hour dynamic ECG signals. Consequently, even experienced cardiologists may face difficulty in producing all accurate ECG reports. In recent years, neural network-based automatic ECG diagnosis methods have exhibited promising performance, suggesting a potential alternative to the labor-intensive examination conducted by cardiologists. However, many existing approaches failed to adequately consider the temporal and channel dimensions when assembling features and ignored interpretability. And clinical theory underscores the necessity of prolonged signal observations for diagnosing certain ECG conditions such as tachycardia. Moreover, specific heart diseases manifest primarily through distinct ECG leads represented as channels. In response to these challenges, this paper introduces a novel neural network architecture for ECG classification (diagnosis). The proposed model incorporates Lead Fusing blocks, transformer-XL encoder-based Encoder modules, and hierarchical temporal attentions. Importantly, this classifier operates directly on raw ECG time-series signals rather than cardiac cycles. Signal integration begins with the Lead Fusing blocks, followed by the Encoder modules and hierarchical temporal attentions, enabling the extraction of long-dependent features. Furthermore, we argue that existing convolution-based methods compromise interpretability, while our proposed neural network offers improved clarity in this regard. Experimental evaluation on a comprehensive public dataset confirms the superiority of our classifier over state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, visualizations reveal the enhanced interpretability provided by our approach. Highlights Our model extracts long-dependent features of ECG signals based on the Transformer-XL encoder. The proposed network offers the improved interpretability. Our classifier achieves superior performance over other state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".