MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390659634 · doi:10.5802/alco.322

A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:math> -analog of the Markoff injectivity conjecture holds

2024· article· en· W4390659634 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sebastien Labbé, Mélodie Lapointe, Wolfgang Steiner

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgebraic Combinatorics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsConjectureUniquenessMathematicsChristoffel symbolsPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elements of Markoff triples are given by coefficients in certain matrix products defined by Christoffel words, and the Markoff injectivity conjecture, a longstanding open problem (also known as the uniqueness conjecture), is then equivalent to injectivity on Christoffel words. A q -analog of these matrix products has been proposed recently, and we prove that injectivity on Christoffel words holds for this q -analog. The proof is based on the evaluation at q = exp ( i π / 3 ) . Other roots of unity provide some information on the original problem, which corresponds to the case q = 1 . We also extend the problem to arbitrary words and provide a large family of pairs of words where injectivity does not hold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1610.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlgebraic CombinatoricsSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207