MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390670030 · doi:10.3390/en17020307

An Empirical Mode Decomposition-Based Hybrid Model for Sub-Hourly Load Forecasting

2024· article· en· W4390670030 on OpenAlexaff
Chuang Yin, Nan Wei, Jinghang Wu, Chuhong Ruan, Xi Luo, Fanhua Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformSeries (stratigraphy)Range (aeronautics)Mode (computer interface)Context (archaeology)Computer scienceTerm (time)AlgorithmDecompositionSingular spectrum analysisTime seriesDetrended fluctuation analysisMathematicsSingular value decompositionStatisticsMachine learningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sub-hourly load forecasting can provide accurate short-term load forecasts, which is important for ensuring a secure operation and minimizing operating costs. Decomposition algorithms are suitable for extracting sub-series and improving forecasts in the context of short-term load forecasting. However, some existing algorithms like singular spectrum analysis (SSA) struggle to decompose high sampling frequencies and rapidly changing sub-hourly load series due to inherent flaws. Considering this, we propose an empirical mode decomposition-based hybrid model, named EMDHM. The decomposition part of this novel model first detrends the linear and periodic components from the original series. The remaining detrended long-range correlation series is simplified using empirical mode decomposition (EMD), generating intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Fluctuation analysis is employed to identify high-frequency information, which divide IMFs into two types of long-range series. In the forecasting part, linear and periodic components are predicted by linear and trigonometric functions, while two long-range components are fitted by long short-term memory (LSTM) for prediction. Four forecasting series are ensembled to find the final result of EMDHM. In experiments, the model’s framework we propose is highly suitable for handling sub-hourly load datasets. The MAE, RMSE, MARNE, and R2 of EMDHM have improved by 20.1%, 26.8%, 22.1%, and 5.4% compared to single LSTM, respectively. Furthermore, EMDHM can handle both short- and long-sequence, sub-hourly load forecasting tasks. Its R2 only decreases by 4.7% when the prediction length varies from 48 to 720, which is significantly lower than other models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinghigh
grokno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinghigh
opusno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelingmedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 3 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods · Empirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207