MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390687631 · doi:10.1017/9781800109353.009

Minstrelsy at Court

2023· other· en· W4390687631 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duties of the royal minstrels The royal household minstrels fulfilled a wide spectrum of requirements, ranging from the most official ceremonial duties to the most nearly private entertainment for the king or other personage. Since almost the whole of a monarch's life was ‘official’, minstrelsy of various sorts must have been needed every day: and while there would be plenty of warning of any occasion needing large resources (such as a major feast or the arrival of a foreign ruler), some solo or small concerted minstrelsy might be demanded at any time. The four minstrels required at all times would have been enough for normal day-to-day requirements, with the rest of the minstrels coming to Court for the major feasts of the year. In theory this arrangement cut the costs of minstrelsy to a minimum; in practice, the year was full of minor celebrations and occasions for which more than the minimum minstrelsy was needed. The only substantial extant account of the minstrels’ duties is in the Liber Niger of 1471–2. While this is late in our period, the ‘Black Book’ was based on earlier ordinances, and the basic outlines of a royal minstrel's work cannot have changed greatly for a long time. The minstrels played to announce meals. Outside the feasttimes when all the minstrels were present, this function was presumably carried out by the two trumpeters on permanent duty. Their other main function was to signal the king's position in the countryside when he went riding, so that the household could follow. If the king wished it, the two trumpeters could be supplemented by two string-minstrels, bringing the resident minstrels to the four (two loud and two ‘still’) specified in previous ordinances. The still minstrels would be able to provide intimate entertainment: and if other still minstrels were present in Court there would be a wider range of possible minstrelsy. The other nine minstrels specified by the Black Book were to come to Court at v festes of the yere, and than to make theyre wages of houshold after iiijd. ob. a day if they be present in court; and than they to auoyde the next day after the festes be don.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4190.114

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207