MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390689516 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.04.574160

Increased extra-axial cerebrospinal fluid and benign external hydrocephalus in early autism

2024· preprint· en· W4390689516 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gal Ben‐Arie, Ilan Shelef, Gal Meiri, Idan Menashe, Ilan Dinstein, Ayelet Arazi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli Foundation
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidSubarachnoid spaceAutismEtiologyMedicineHydrocephalusAutism spectrum disorderPediatricsBrain sizeMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingTypically developingInternal medicineRadiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Previous studies have reported that some children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) below the age of 3-years-old exhibit increased extra-axial cerebrospinal fluid (EA-CSF) volumes, suggesting that transient early CSF circulation abnormalities may characterize a unique etiology in a sub-group of ASD children. Specifically, this sub-group was proposed to exhibit an EA-CSF to total brain volume (TBV) ratio >0.14. It is unknown whether such findings may correspond to an early radiological diagnosis of Benign external hydrocephalus (BEH), which is defined as an enlargement of CSF volumes within the subarachnoid space (SAS) during the first two years of life. Here we examined a retrospective clinical sample extracted from the National Autism Database of Israel. In 2020, ∼14% of ASD children in the database (n= 102) had completed clinical brain MRI scans at different ages before or after ASD diagnosis. Scans of 83 ASD children fulfilled quality control criteria and were compared to those of 53 age and sex matched typicality developing (TD) children who were referred to the same clinical center for similar clinical reasons. EA-CSF volume and total brain volume (TBV) were quantified from T2-weighted scans using manual labeling and compared across groups. The results revealed that ASD children scanned before the age of 2-years-old (i.e., before ASD diagnosis) exhibited significantly larger EA-CSF volumes when compared to controls (t(49)=2.89, p=0.006, Cohen’s d=0.82). No significant differences were apparent across groups at older ages. Of those scanned before the age of 2-years-old, ∼16% of the ASD children, and none of the control children, exhibited EA-CSF/TBV ratios >0.14, thereby replicating previous findings from prospective research samples. In addition, retrospective examination of the neuroradiology assessments revealed a BEH prevalence of 33% in the ASD children scanned before the age of 2-years-old, with 80% of these children exhibiting EA-CSF/TBV ratios >0.11. These findings reveal a clear relationship between quantitative EA-CSF volume analyses and qualitative BEH radiological findings, which characterize a considerable sub-group of ASD children. Accumulating evidence, therefore, suggests that BEH diagnosis in conjunction with a high EA-CSF/TBV ratio by the age of 2-years-old may be indicative of a specific ASD etiology that warrants further research and may offer unique opportunities for intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207