Eleven competing phases in the Heisenberg-Gamma ( JΓ ) ladder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The spin-orbit generated Γ interaction is known to induce strong frustration and to be significant in realistic models of materials. To gain an understanding of the possible phases that can arise from this interaction, it is of considerable interest to focus on a limited part of parameter space in a quasi one-dimensional model where high precision numerical results can be obtained. Here we study the Heisenberg–Gamma ( <?CDATA $J\Gamma$?> J Γ ) ladder, determining the complete zero temperature phase diagram by analyzing the entanglement spectrum (ES) and energy susceptibility. A total of 11 different phases can be identified, among them the well known rung-singlet (RS) phase and 5 other phases, FM, FM-Z, FM-XY, AF and AF-Z, with conventional long-range magnetic order. The 3 ferromagnetic phases, FM, FM-Z and FM-XY simultaneously have non-zero scalar chirality. Two other phases, the antiferromagnetic Gamma (AΓ) and ferromagnetic Gamma (FΓ) phases, have previously been observed in the Kitaev–Gamma ladder, demonstrating that the AΓ-phase is a symmetry protected topological phase (SPT) protected by TR <?CDATA $\times \mathcal{R}_{b}$?> × R b symmetry, the product of time-reversal (TR) and π rotation around the b-axis ( <?CDATA $\mathcal{R}_{b}$?> R b ), while the FΓ-phase is related to the RS phase through a local unitary transformation. The 3 remaining phases, ϒ, Ω and δ show no conventional order, a doubling of the ES and for the ϒ and Ω-phases a gap is clearly present. The δ-phase has a significantly smaller gap and displays incommensurate correlations, with a peak in the static structure factor, S(k) continuously shifting from <?CDATA $k/\pi=2/3$?> k / π = 2 / 3 to <?CDATA $k=\pi$?> k = π . In the Ω-phase we find pronounced edge-states consistent with a SPT phase protected by the same TR <?CDATA $\times \mathcal{R}_{b}$?> × R b symmetry as the AΓ-phase. The precise nature of the ϒ and δ-phases is less clear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".