Surgical Considerations in Inner Ear Gene Therapy from Human Temporal Bone Anatomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S): Recently directed methods of inner ear drug delivery underscore the necessity for understanding critical anatomical dimensions. This study examines anatomical measurements of the human middle and inner ear relevant for inner ear drug delivery studied with three different imaging modalities. METHODS: Post-mortem human temporal bones were analyzed using human temporal bone histopathology (N = 24), micro computerized tomography (μCT; N = 4), and synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI; N = 7). Nine measurements involving the oval and round windows were performed when relevant anatomical structures were visualized for subsequent age-controlled analysis, and comparisons were made between imaging methods. RESULTS: Combined human temporal bone histopathology showed the mean distance to the saccule from the center of the stapes footplate (FP) was 2.07 ± 0.357 mm and the minimum distance was 1.23 mm. The mean distance from the round window membrane (RWM) to the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) was 1.75 ± 0.199 mm and the minimum distance was 1.43 mm. Instruments inserted up to 1 mm past the center of the FP are unlikely to cause saccular damage, provided there are no endolymphatic hydrops. Similarly, instruments inserted up to 1 mm through the RWM in the trajectory toward the OSL are unlikely to cause OSL damage. CONCLUSION: The combined analyses of inner-ear dimensions of age-controlled groups and imaging modalities demonstrate critical dimensions of importance to consider when inserting delivery vehicles into the human cochlea. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:2879-2888, 2024.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".