Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scandinavian-Canadian Studies/Études scandinaves au Canada is the official publication of the Association for the Advancement of Scandinavian Studies (AASSC) in Canada.Volume 30 is a regular journal volume, in which articles, translations, and reviews representing a variety of topics related to the Nordic region are published.It includes all contributions published online during the 2023 calendar year.The present volume contains five articles.The first of these, written by Juliane Egerer, is a comparative piece, which explores two trauma life writings: one Afro-Swedish and the other Ojibwe-Canadian, by Johannes Anyuru and Wab Kinew, respectively.The comparison is based on a number of shared themes, and Egerer demonstrates how the writings by these two authors deconstruct Eurowestern ways of thinking and thereby contribute to the process of decolonization.The theme of colonialism continues in Christopher Crocker's article, which tells the story of a controversial Icelandic statue of Guðríðr Þorbjarnardóttir and discusses how it and other representations of the statue's subject reinforce harmful racialist histories and ideologies and also contribute to Indigenous erasure in North America.The third article, written by Dirk Gindt, is an analysis of the rhetorical features, context, and limitations of a 2021 service that took place in Uppsala Cathedral, in which the Church of Sweden apologized for its role in the colonization of Sápmi.Gindt draws important comparisons to Stephen Harper's formal apology to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples in Canada, which was delivered in 2008 in the House of Commons as part of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".