Response to Hall <i>et al</i>.: Prescription psychostimulants for amphetamine‐type stimulant use disorder ‐ acknowledging challenges but not giving up on its potential cost‐effectiveness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AddictionEarly View LETTER TO THE EDITOR Response to Hall et al.: Prescription psychostimulants for amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder - acknowledging challenges but not giving up on its potential cost-effectiveness Heidar Sharafi, Heidar Sharafi orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-9117 Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)Search for more papers by this authorDidier Jutras-Aswad, Corresponding Author Didier Jutras-Aswad [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-8474-508X Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence Didier Jutras-Aswad, CHUM Research Centre, 900 St-Denis, Viger Tower, Room R05.746, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 1P1. Email: [email protected] Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)Search for more papers by this author Heidar Sharafi, Heidar Sharafi orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-9117 Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)Search for more papers by this authorDidier Jutras-Aswad, Corresponding Author Didier Jutras-Aswad [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-8474-508X Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence Didier Jutras-Aswad, CHUM Research Centre, 900 St-Denis, Viger Tower, Room R05.746, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 1P1. Email: [email protected] Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)Search for more papers by this author First published: 10 January 2024 https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16434Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Hall W, Darke S, Farrell M. Do we need clinical trials of high dose stimulant agonist treatment for stimulant use disorders? Addiction. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16416 10.1111/add.16416 PubMedGoogle Scholar 2Sharafi H, Bakouni H, McAnulty C, Drouin S, Coronado-Montoya S, Bahremand A, et al. Prescription psychostimulants for the treatment of amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Addiction. 2024. PMID: Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16347 10.1111/add.16347 Web of Science®Google Scholar 3Konstenius M, Jayaram-Lindstrom N, Guterstam J, Beck O, Philips B, Franck J. Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and drug relapse in criminal offenders with substance dependence: a 24-week randomized placebo-controlled trial. Addiction. 2014; 109: 440–449. 10.1111/add.12369 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4Nadine E, Adrian D, Michelle H, Robert A, Rebecca M, Raimondo B, et al. LiMA: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. BMJ Open. 2018; 8:e020723. PubMedGoogle Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.073 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.033 | 0.036 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".