MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390705910 · doi:10.33137/rr.v46i2.42312

Estes, James M. Good Government and Church Order: Essays on the Role of Secular Authority in the German Reformation

2024· article· en· W4390705910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Willis Goth Regier

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanOrder (exchange)Political scienceReligious studiesTheologySociologyHistoryPhilosophyEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For fifty years, James M. Estes has studied relations between church and state in early Reformation Germany.This book collects his major essays from that period.Ten of its eleven chapters are revisions of essays previously published in journals and Festschriften; the eleventh is first published here.Each essay was composed to be read independently, a quality all retain.Good as they were apart, they're better together: they refer to each other and cohere tightly.When they overlap, repetition emphasizes key points.Chapters are arranged in order of composition, circa 1972 to 2009, proof of Estes's consistency and expansion.The last two chapters on Luther are exemplary.The appendix is Estes's translation of Melanchthon's De officio principum (1539), a bonus of the collection, and the subject of chapter 8.Chapters study the political views of major reformers, especially Erasmus, Luther, Melanchthon, and Brenz, men of influence.They advised Christian princes about their Christian duty, sought their protection, and asked for their financial support.The reformers argued about heresy, church organization, and holidays, but concurred that the church depended on secular rulers, first of all, to safeguard church property.They offered princes "true religion" (interpreted by theologians) and expected the rulers to enforce it.Pleased by the enforcements by his prince (John, Elector of Saxony), Luther praised him from his pulpit (278-79).Estes concludes that Luther was more reluctant than Melanchthon and Brenz to involve the state in church affairs, but he gradually came to their point of view about what was possible and what was necessary.Chapter 11, "Luther's Attitude toward the Legal Traditions of His Time, " notes his increasing contempt for canon law and its jurists, and his defence of widows against German law, two more traditions in need of reformation.What could reformers expect from princes?Estes looks at the 1530s, when disappointments changed expectations.Melanchthon and Luther recognized that what German princes most liked about the Reformation was appropriating monasteries' lands and silver.That being so, reformers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207