MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390722080 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.04.24300735

Apolipoprotein E-Genotyping and MRI Study for Alzheimer’s Disease Classification: PCR-RFLP and Restricted Enzymes AfIII for RS429358 and HaeII for RS7412

2024· preprint· en· W4390722080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nur Hafizah Mohad Azmi, Subapriya Suppiah, NSN Ibrahim, Buhari Ibrahim, VP Seriramulu, Mazlyfarina Mohamad, T Karuppiah, NF Omar, Normala Ibrahim, RM Razali, NH Harrun, H Sallehuddin, N Syed Nasser, AD Piersson

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
KeywordsApolipoprotein EDefault mode networkNeuroimagingDementiaClinical Dementia RatingMedicineNeurosciencePsychologyResting state fMRIDiseaseCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The most common type of dementia in neurodegenerative diseases is Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a progressive neurological illness that causes memory loss. Neurophysiological tests, including the montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and clinical dementia rating (CDR) scores, are used to identify AD. Neuroimaging studies T1-weighted MRI scans assessed brain structural abnormalities. AD patients had grey matter volume (GMV) loss in brain structures when structural MRI data were analysed using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Neuroimaging studies using resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI)-blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) sequence for brain imaging were processed using the seed-based analysis (SBA) method to analyse functional connectivity (FC) in the default mode network (DMN), sensorimotor network (SEN), executive control network (ECN), language network (LN), visuospatial network (VN), and salience network (SAN). Late-onset AD can be studied using the apolipoprotein E gene (ApoE). ApoE has four alleles with LOAD patients having either a homozygous or heterozygous genotype of these alleles. The genotypes, particularly ApoE ε4, are associated with a more significant risk for AD pathogenesis. The combination of genotyping and MRI neuroimaging is a promising avenue for research that starts with protocol optimisation. Objective: to differentiate changes in structural brain volumetric and rs-fMRI functional connectivity strength with the diagnosis of AD and HC by combining ApoE ε4 genetic variations. Materials and Methods Thirty participants with AD, n = 15, and healthy control (HC), n = 15, for the MRI study, and six participants (n = 6) with AD, n = 3, and HC, n = 3, for ApoE genotyping. In this study, we categorised the participants using neuropsychological tests, i.e., MoCA, MMSE, and CDR. We performed structural and functional MRI brain imaging to identify network areas affected by AD. Structural voxel-based morphometry (VBM) models and the CONN Toolbox, which analysed functional MRI using seed-based analysis (SBA), were performed. Genotyping was done by extracting the DNA from the participants’ blood samples. The isolated DNA underwent PCR-RFLP. Then, the restricted enzymes RE AFIII for rs429358 and HAEII for rs7412 were performed. Results There was decreased grey matter volume (GMV) and reduced functional connectivity among AD participants involving the frontal lobe and anterior cingulate gyrus in DMN, SEN, ECN, LN, VN, and SAN. We detected three participants with a homozygous ApoE ε4 negative genotype (non-carriers), which was consistent with the HC genotype. We also detected heterozygous genotype ApoE ε4 positive carriers, which indicated LOAD. Conclusion There is altered GMV in VBM, a decrease in brain activation, and an increase in spatial activation size in rs-fMRI neuronal FC in some areas of the brain with ApoE ε4 carriers in AD participants. Thus, the imaging features of the AD participants are well mapped to their ApoE ε4 carrier status. Thus, we propose our radiogenomics techniques as a useful biomarker for the characterisation of AD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→