Toxicokinetic study of scandium oxide in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada has recently invested in the large-scale exploitation of scandium oxide. However, there are no studies available to date to understand its toxicokinetics in the animal or human body, which is necessary to assess exposure and health risks. The aim of this research was to investigate the toxicokinetics of absorbed scandium oxide (Sc2O3) using the rat as an experimental model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected intravenously with 0.3 or 1 mg Sc2O3/kg body weight (bw). Blood and excreta (urine and feces) were collected sequentially during a 21-day period, and main organs (liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, brain) were withdrawn at sacrifice on day 21. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used for the measurement of Sc element in the different samples. The mean residence time (MRTIV) calculated from the blood profile was 19.7 ± 5.9 h and 43.4 ± 24.6 h at the lower and higher doses, respectively. Highest tissue levels of Sc were found in the lungs and liver; respective lung values of 10.6 ± 6.2% and 3.4 ± 2.3% of the Sc dose were observed at the time of sacrifice while liver levels represented 8.9 ± 6.4% and 4.6 ± 1.1%. Elimination of Sc from the body was not complete after 21 days. Cumulative fecal excretion over the 21-day collection period represented 12.3 ± 1.3% and 5.9 ± 1.0% of the lower and higher Sc doses, respectively, and showed a significant effect of the dose on the excretion; only a small fraction of the Sc dose was recovered in urine (0.025 ± 0.016% and 0.011 ± 0.004% in total, respectively). In addition to an effect of the dose on the toxicokinetics, results highlight the importance of the lung as a site of accumulation and retention of Sc2O3, which raises the question of the risks of effects related to respiratory exposure in workers. The results also question the relevance of urine as a matrix for biological exposure monitoring. A more in-depth inhalation toxicokinetic study would be necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".