MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Higher Noncalcified Plaque Volume Is Associated With Increased Plaque Vulnerability and Vascular Inflammation

2024· article· en· W4390743204 on OpenAlexaff
Keishi Suzuki, Daisuke Kinoshita, Haruhito Yuki, Takayuki Niida, Tomoyo Sugiyama, Taishi Yonetsu, Makoto Araki, Akihiro Nakajima, Lena Marie Seegers, Damini Dey, Hang Lee, Iris McNulty, Masamichi Takano, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Kyoichi Mizuno, Ik‐Kyung Jang

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsHealth Research Foundation
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsHounsfield scaleMedicineComputed tomography angiographyInternal medicineOptical coherence tomographyCardiologyNuclear medicineComputed tomographyRadiologyAngiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recently, it was reported that noncalcified plaque (NCP) volume was an independent predictor for cardiac events. Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation is a marker of vascular inflammation and has been associated with increased cardiac mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between NCP volume, plaque vulnerability, and PCAT attenuation. METHODS: Patients who underwent preintervention coronary computed tomography angiography and optical coherence tomography were enrolled. Plaque volume was measured by computed tomography angiography, plaque vulnerability by optical coherence tomography, and the level of coronary inflammation by PCAT attenuation. The plaques were divided into 2 groups of high or low NCP volume based on the median NCP volume. RESULTS: Among 704 plaques in 454 patients, the group with high NCP volume had a higher prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (87.2% versus 75.9%; P <0.001), thin-cap fibroatheroma (38.1% versus 20.7%; P <0.001), macrophage (77.8% versus 63.4%; P <0.001), microvessel (58.2% versus 42.9%; P <0.001), and cholesterol crystal (42.0% versus 26.7%; P <0.001) than the group with low NCP plaque volume. The group with high NCP volume also had higher PCAT attenuation than the group with low NCP volume (−69.6±10.0 versus −73.5±10.6 Hounsfield unit; P <0.001). In multivariable analysis, NCP volume was significantly associated with thin-cap fibroatheroma and high PCAT attenuation. In the analysis of the combination of PCAT attenuation and NCP volume, the prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheroma was the highest in the high PCAT attenuation and high NCP volume group and the lowest in the low PCAT attenuation and low NCP volume group. CONCLUSIONS: Higher NCP volume was associated with higher plaque vulnerability and vascular inflammation. The combination of PCAT attenuation and NCP volume may help identify plaque vulnerability noninvasively. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04523194.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207