Unusual OCT findings in a patient with CABP4-associated cone–rod synaptic disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bi-allelic variants in CABP4 are associated with congenital cone-rod synaptic disorder, which has also been classified, electrophysiologically, as incomplete congenital stationary night blindness (iCSNB). We describe clinical findings in a patient who demonstrated an unusual macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) phenotype, not previously reported in this condition. METHODS: Our patient underwent multimodal retinal imaging, international standard full-field ERG testing and whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: The patient was a 60-year-old woman with non-progressive visual impairment since birth, nystagmus and preference for dim lighting. Clinical fundus examination was unremarkable. OCT imaging revealed a hypo-reflective zone under an elevated fovea in both eyes. ERGs showed an electronegative DA10 response, with severely abnormal light-adapted responses. Whole genome sequencing revealed homozygosity for a known pathogenic variant in CABP4. No variants were found in other genes that could explain the patient's phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: OCT findings of foveal elevation and an underlying hypo-reflective zone are novel in this condition. Whilst the clinical history was similar to achromatopsia and other cone dysfunction syndromes, ERG findings suggested disease associated with CACNA1F or CABP4. As CACNA1F is X-linked, CABP4 was more likely, and confirmed on genetic testing. The patient saw better in dim light, confirming that night blindness is not a feature of CABP4-associated disease. Our case highlights the value of ERGs in discriminating between causes of cone dysfunction, and extends the range of retinal imaging phenotypes reported in this disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".