A Flexible Printed Circuit Board Based Microelectromechanical Field Mill with a Vertical Movement Shutter Driven by an Electrostatic Actuator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micromachined electric field mills have received much interest for the measurement of DC fields; however, conventional designs with lateral moving shutters could have shutter lifting in the presence of strong fields, which affects their performance. This paper presents a MEMS electric field mill utilizing a vertical movement shutter to address this issue. The sensor is designed and fabricated based on a flexible PCB substrate and is released using a laser-cutting process. The movement of the shutter is driven by an electrostatic actuator. When the driving signal is a sine wave, the shutter moves in the same direction during both the positive and negative half-periods. This facilitates the application of a lock-in amplifier to synchronize with the signal at twice the frequency of the driving signal. In experimental testing, when the vertical shutter is driven at a resonance of 840 Hz, the highest sensitivity of the sensor is achieved and is measured to be 5.1 V/kVm−1. The sensor also demonstrates a good linearity of 1.1% for measuring DC electric fields in the range of 1.25 kV/m to 25 kV/m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".