MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390753171 · doi:10.18060/27795

Prenatal Predictors of Survival, Pulmonary Hypertension, and ECMO in Isolated CDH Undergoing Expectant Management, A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4390753171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Thiel, Alena Tofte, Asma Khalil, Hiba J. Mustafa

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of IMPRS · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisPulmonary hypertensionPersistent pulmonary hypertensionIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Hypothesis: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe developmental defect affecting 1-4 per 10,000 births, characterized by left/right-sided defect, or mixed with herniation of abdominal contents into thorax, with resultant lung hypoplasia and persistent pulmonary hypertension (PHTN). The study investigates prenatal predictors of survival to hospital discharge, PHTN and the need for ECMO in fetuses with isolated CDH undergoing prenatal expectant management. Project Methods: We performed a systematic literature review on prenatal diagnostic tests in fetuses with isolated CDH undergoing expectant management. Primary outcomes included survival-to-hospital discharge, persistent PHTN within 28 days, and ECMO need. Newcastle Ottawa Scale assessed quality of studies. Meta-analysis performed when two or more studies reported on the same test. Subgroup analysis performed according to CDH side. Results: 161 full-text articles between 2000-2022 were assed for eligibility; 48 met inclusion criteria. 45 reported on survival, 12 on ECMO need, 8 on PHTN; quality of studies was moderate. Studies included were retrospective (81%) or prospective (19%) regarding fetuses undergoing expectant management (77%), or mixed tracheal occlusion and expectant management (20%). Most studies included mixed (41%) or left-sided (47%) CDH. Survival predicted by TFLV, o/e-TFLV, o/e-TFLV <30%, LiTR, o/e-LHR, o/e-LHR <25%, percentage herniated liver, MSA, stomach position in mid-chest, and liver up. ECMO need predicted by o/e-TFLV, o/e-LHR, and PPLV. These results were confirmed through subgroup analysis of only left-sided lesions. PHTN was predicted by presence of intrathoracic liver (OR-1.96, 95%CI 1.14,3.37, I2-0%); this was not significant after left-sided subgroup analysis. Conclusion and Potential Impact: In fetuses with CDH, FLV and presence/percentage of intrathoracic liver predict survival. FLV measurements predict ECMO need. Presence of intrathoracic liver may predict persistent PHTN; further studies are needed. Accurate prognostication of CDH severity would aid patient triage, resource mobilization, and identification of high-risk CDH infants in need of advanced treatment including ECMO or identification of candidates for fetal intervention procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.026
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of IMPRSSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207