Integrated soil amendments for potato crop performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Present study on integrated soil amendments for potato crop performance was conducted at the Horticultural Research Farm of Chaudhary Shivnath Singh Shandilya (P.G.) College, Machhra, Meerut (U.P.) during rabi season of the year 2020-21. The experiment was laid out in RBD (Randomized Block Design) with nine treatments consisting of different organic and inorganic fertilizers, both alone and in combination, replicated thrice. Observations on growth parameters at 60 and 90 days after planting (DAP), yield parameters at the time of harvest and quality parameters after harvest were recorded for statistical analysis. The result obtained indicated superiority of combinations of inorganic and organic fertilizers as compared to the other treatments in terms of growth and yield parameters. The maximum plant height, greater number of leaves per hill and greater tuber diameter were observed with treatment receiving half of the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and 20 t/ha FYM, while the maximum number of haulms per hill and higher dry matter content was observed in treatment receiving 5 t/ha vermicompost. More number of branches per plant, yield characters i.e., number of tubers/ plant, weight of tuber, average tuber weight, and yield of tuber were recorded in treatment receiving full RDF along with 5 t/ha vermicompost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".