MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EXPANDING SMALL BUSINESSES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: ANALYZING RECENT TRENDS AND EXPLORING NEW GROWTH STRATEGIES IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH

2023· article· en· W4390761208 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Osamuyimen Eboigbe, Oluwatoyin Ajoke Farayola, Donald Obinna Daraojimba, Busari Olumuyiwa Samod, Francisamary Chinyere Okonkwo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of Third World Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeveloping countryBusinessRevenuePovertySmall businessSmall and medium-sized enterprisesEconomic growthDevelopment economicsEconomicsMarketingFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small businesses are the microcosm of developing countries economy. They are the oil that keeps the citizens going. They come in form of neighbourhood kiosk seller, to airtime or food vendors, among others. Their key role informs this study to undertake a review of the expansion of small businesses in developing countries with in-depth analysis of the recent trends. This is with a view of exploring the new growth strategies in the global south. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role in the global South, contributing substantially to employment, economic growth, and poverty reduction. Recent trends in SMEs in the global South highlight their resilience, adaptability, and increasing adoption of technology. It was observed that there is an estimated 89 million SMEs exist in the developing countries and contribute 70% of formal employment in developing countries. SMEs contribute up to 45% of GDP in developing countries. Women are also driving the growth of SMEs with 50% contribution in Africa. In the United States, women-owned businesses employ nearly 9 million people and generate over $1 trillion in revenue. In India, women-owned businesses create over 13 million jobs and contribute over $200 billion to the economy. The study also gave useful suggestions needed to expand small businesses in developing countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Of Third World EconomicsSame topicInnovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207