Bicontinuous microemulsion in binary blends of complementary diblock copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase behavior of binary blends of AB diblock copolymers of compositions f and 1 - f is examined using field-theoretic simulations. Highly asymmetric compositions (i.e., f ≈ 0) behave like homopolymer blends macrophase separating into coexisting A- and B-rich phases as the segregation is increased, whereas more symmetric diblocks (i.e., f ≈ 0.5) microphase separate into an ordered lamellar phase. In self-consistent field theory, these behaviors are separated by a Lifshitz critical point at f = 0.2113. However, its lower critical dimension is believed to be four, which implies that the Lifshitz point should be destroyed by fluctuations. Consistent with this, it is found to transform into a tricritical point. Furthermore, the highly swollen lamellar phase near the mean-field Lifshitz point disorders into a bicontinuous microemulsion (BμE), consisting of large interpenetrating A- and B-rich microdomains. BμE has been previously reported in ternary blends of AB diblock copolymer with its parent A- and B-type homopolymers, but in that system the homopolymers have a tendency to macrophase separate. Our alternative system for creating BμE is free of this macrophase separation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".