Bibliographic record
Abstract
Báti Anikó : Menzadimenziók. A gyermek-közétkeztetés társadalmi beágyazottsága. Budapest: BTK Néprajztudományi Intézet, 2023. 237–249. p. Kapitány Ágnes – Kapitány Gábor: Az étkezés jelrendszere – étkezés és identitás DOI: https://doi.org/10.61380/978-963-567-072-7-09 Abstract: Eating and food have always played a prominent role in the development of the characteristics of a culture. That is why cultural anthropology is especially focused on these topics. In our study, we would like to present some analytical dimensions that can be used in the analysis of food culture, partly through the cultural anthropological and partly through the socio-semiotic approach. First, we look at the gastrosemiotic aspects that are helpful in sorting food along different dichotomies and poles. Here we cover aspects that may indicate differences between cultures and subcultures, aspects that relate to differences in mealtimes, and aspects that are rooted in the material differences of foods. Next, we list the dimensions that, as general factors of status symbols, can also play a role in the analysis of food. In the study, we also cover our longitudinal study called Symbols of Hungarianness conducted on a national representative sample of 1,000 people, where we inquired about typical foods and drinks from the point of view of national identity, which are thus also suitable for presenting certain characteristics of Hungarian cuisine. Kulcsszavak: kulturális antropológia, gasztronómia, szocio-szemiotika, nemzeti identitás, hierarchia szimbólumok Keywords: cultural anthropology, gastronomy, socio-semiotics, national identity, hierarchy symbol PDF
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.061 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".