Inkjet-printed transistors with coffee ring aligned carbon nanotubes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Low-concentration deposition techniques such as inkjet printing for forming carbon nanotube (CNT) transistor channels typically result in higher on–off current ratio, while lowering the field-effect mobility compared to traditional high-concentration techniques. In this paper, we show that inkjet-printed devices can have both high field-effect mobility and on–off current ratio by utilizing coffee ring induced thickness variation in the channel. The coffee ring effect occurs naturally in printed patterns with most solvents and substrates, and it pushes dissolved particles to the edges of printed features. Thickness variation and coffee ring effect are usually avoided in the channel of solution processed thin-film transistors by implementing additional expensive steps in the fabrication process. Instead, here, we control these variations and utilize them to create inkjet-printed CNT channels with printing induced thickness variation that improves transistor properties. Printing properties such as printing speed, and number of layers are studied to manipulate capillary flow and form thicker line edges, which ultimately enhance current transport in the CNT network. A two-pass printing pattern with separate lines improves the field-effect mobility five times compared to a pattern with connected lines that has no defined edges. The field-effect mobility increases from 1.1 to 5.7 cm 2 V −1 s −1 at a drain voltage of −2 V.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it