Severe disability and self-reported depression and anxiety among persons living with Type 2 diabetes in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• The prevalence of self-reported depression and anxiety among persons living with Type 2 diabetes in Canada was 12.4% and 10.1% respectively. • Severe disability was reported by 21% of those living with Type 2 diabetes. • Severe disability was significantly associated with both depression and anxiety disorders. • Dissatisfaction with life, extremely stressful life events, being single, female sex, obesity, poor self-rated health, and current smoking status were significant risk factors for both mental health disorders. • Increasing age and higher income status were significant protective factors for depression and anxiety among those living with Type 2 diabetes in Canada. This study aims to estimate the national prevalence of self-reported depression and anxiety disorders among persons living with Type 2 diabetes in Canada, as well as to investigate the potential link between disability severity and these conditions. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a subsample (N=8,321) of participants living with Type 2 diabetes in the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey-Annual Component. Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the association between disability severity and depression and anxiety disorders. Descriptive statistics, prevalence estimates, adjusted relative risk, and 95% confidence intervals are reported. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 18. The prevalence of depression and anxiety were 12.4% and 10.1% respectively. Our study found disability severity as a strong risk factor for both psychiatric disorders. We also found (1) dissatisfaction with life, (2) extremely stressful life events, (3) being female (4) single or never married, (5) poor self-rated health, (6) obesity, and (7) current smoker as significant risk factors for both psychiatric disorders. Conversely, increasing age and higher annual personal income status were significant protective factors. The study's limitations include the inability to establish temporal connections between risk factors and psychiatric disorders due to the cross-sectional design and the exclusion of those living in remote parts of the country and others from participation in the survey, which may underestimate the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes and severe disability. This study's findings point toward a growing demand for tertiary prevention to increase the probability for those living with Type 2 diabetes in Canada of maintaining functional health, improving mental health, and having a better quality of life. Public health prevention efforts targeted at decreasing the prevalence of diabetes and its complications and disability severity are recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it