Subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive impairment in patients suspected of obstructive sleep apnea who underwent polysomnography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is linked to cognitive impairment. We aimed to investigate subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) and objective cognitive scores and their relation to polysomnography (PSG) parameters in patients suspected of having OSA. METHODS: A prospective cohort cross-sectional study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital. Patients suspected of OSA who were scheduled for PSG were recruited. Cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Color Trails Test (CTT). The Memory Index Score (MIS) was calculated from the MoCA. Subjective cognitive complaint presence was assessed through direct questioning of patients and by employing the Cognitive Change Index rated by self or informants (CCI-I). Patients with severe dementia were excluded. RESULTS: Among 258 patients (mean age 61.46 ± 7.05 years, 51.2% female), the mean MoCA score was 23.89 ± 3.89. Based on PSG results, patients were categorized into groups as follows: those without OSA or with mild OSA (combined total of 20.1%), moderate OSA (28.3%), or severe OSA (51.6%). Cognitive Change Index rated by self and CCI-I scores correlated significantly (r = 0.238, p = 0.019) but not with the MoCA score or CTT time. Objective cognitive scores were associated with PSG parameters: total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep stages, mean O2 saturation, and time spent with SaO2 below 90% (all p < 0.05). Subjective cognitive scores were not associated with PSG parameters, except CCI-I with TST. Participants with objective cognitive impairment had lower education, higher body mass index, more comorbidities, and lower SCC percentage (all p < 0.05). Patients with moderate to severe OSA had a higher proportion of objective cognitive impairment (64.1%) but a lower incidence of SCC (38.3%) than patients with no OSA or mild OSA. Thirty patients with severe OSA and cognitive impairment received continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for a mean of 12.2 months. These patients showed MoCA and MIS improvement, but no significant changes were observed in their CTT and Cognitive Change Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with OSA had objective cognitive impairment, but SCC was less frequent in patients with more severe OSA. Several PSG parameters correlated with cognitive scores but not with subjective cognitive scores. Patients with severe OSA may benefit cognitively from CPAP treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".