MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390793500 · doi:10.1080/00952990.2023.2292010

Cannabis cravings predict cigarette use in schizophrenia: a secondary analysis from two cannabis abstinence studies

2024· article· en· W4390793500 on OpenAlexafffund
Samantha Johnstone, Maryam Sorkhou, Molly Zhang, Sarah S. Dermody, Rachel A. Rabin, Tony P. George

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCannabisAbstinencePsychiatrySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Effects of cannabisPsychologyTobacco useMedicineEnvironmental healthClinical psychologyCannabidiolPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: People with schizophrenia have high rates of cannabis use disorder (CUD) as well as co-use of tobacco. Tobacco may be used to alleviate cannabis cravings.Objectives: We conducted a secondary analysis of 7 and 28 days of cannabis abstinence from two datasets of participants with CUD with and without schizophrenia to assess cannabis craving, cannabis use in grams per day (GPD) and cigarettes per day (CPD).Methods: We recruited 49 participants (schizophrenia n = 29; control n = 20; 2% female) with CUD. All participants received weekly behavioral support sessions to assist with cannabis abstinence/reduction. GPD and CPD were assessed with the 7-day Timeline Follow-back; the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ) assessed compulsivity, emotionality, expectancy and purposefulness subscales. Effects of GPD and MCQ subscales on CPD at days 7 and 28 were assessed with analysis of covariance.Results: At day seven, participants with schizophrenia scored higher on compulsivity (t = 2.72, df = 46.8, p < .01), emotionality (t = 2.48, df = 45.2, p = .02), and purposefulness (t = 2.32, df = 39.41, p = .02) craving subscales than control participants. There was a significant interaction between high purposefulness craving and low GPD on high CPD at day seven (F1,23 = 4.76, p = .039) and day 28 (F1,13 = 7.02 p = .02) in schizophrenia participants but not control participants.Conclusion: We found preliminary evidence that due to cannabis craving intensity, people with schizophrenia and CUD may use more cigarettes when reducing cannabis use, as compared to CUD participants without schizophrenia. Strategies to manage cannabis craving and avoid increasing tobacco use will be useful to implement in intervention strategies.Clinical Trial Name Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Cannabis Use and Cognitive Outcomes in SchizophreniaURL: www.clinicaltrials.gov; Registration Number: NCT03189810;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Drug and Alcohol AbuseSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207