Effect of Annealing Temperature and Time on the Magnetic Properties and Magnetic Anisotropy of a Temper-Rolled, Semi-processed Non-oriented Electrical Steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effect of final annealing temperature and time on the core loss, magnetic permeability, and magnetic anisotropy of a temper-rolled, semi-processed 0.5 wt.% Si non-oriented electrical steel was investigated. The magnetic properties of the steel sheets at 50–400 Hz and 0.5–1.50 T were measured by the Epstein frame method on strips cut along both the rolling (RD) and transverse directions (TD). Optimal magnetic properties were obtained when the annealing temperature was at 800–825°C, and the annealing time was 2–4 h. Relatively large magnetic anisotropy between the RD and TD was observed in samples after recrystallization (~ 10% in core loss and ~ 70% in relative permeability), while deformed and non-recrystallized samples showed small anisotropy in magnetic properties. Regardless of the processing state of the steel, i.e., temper-rolled, recovered, or recrystallized, the core loss followed quadratic polynomial functions with respect to both the frequency and magnetic flux density, while the relative magnetic permeability followed cubic polynomial functions with respect to both the frequency and magnetic flux density. The microstructure and texture of selected samples were characterized by electron backscatter diffraction, which revealed the correlations between the magnetic properties of the steel and the microstructure and texture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".