Power quality control of battery charging system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to present the PQ improvement aspects in a battery charger used for EV applications. Featuring a near unity input PF and low THD on the line, the input stage can have different converter-based PF correctors. The converters can be single-phase-controlled and -uncontrolled converters followed by DC-DC converters or multi-pulse converters or multi-level converters. The control strategy can be used for bidirectional power flow in these converters and a special DAB converter for V2G or G2V operation from a solar or any renewable energy-based charger. Such chargers are considered as green chargers. To improve efficiency and to increase switching frequency, a zero-voltage isolated full bridge/interleaved DC/DC converter or zero voltage or zero current switching schemes can also be employed. It can be summarized that the PQ improvement is an essential requirement for any kind of chargers and it is implementable in many ways, as demonstrated in this chapter but not limited to these methods only. The readers may have various ideas on the basis of the presented concepts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".