Activity Discovered on Mars-Crossing Jupiter Family Comet 2018 OR by Citizen Scientists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present the discovery of cometary activity on 2018 OR as part of our Active Asteroids project, a NASA Partner Program fueled by Zooniverse Citizen Scientists. Volunteers found 2018 OR with a long, diffuse tail in archival images from the Dark Energy Camera on the Blanco 4 m telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. Our team identified additional Canada–France–Hawaii–Telescope MegaCam and Zwicky Transient Facility archival data after classification by Citizen Scientists. Activity originating from 2018 OR and directed in the anti-solar and anti-velocity directions was visible in archival images between UT 2018 September 5–18. Our dynamical simulations indicate 2018 OR experiences close encounters with Jupiter over hundred-year timescales. The orbital period and dynamics suggest 2018 OR is a Jupiter Family Comet, and we recommend further observations from the community to reduce observational uncertainties and investigate activity patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".