Assessing the potential of using a virtual Veselago lens in quantitative microwave imaging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study explores the potential of implementing the focusing properties of a virtual ideal Veselago lens within a standard free-space microwave imaging scenario. To achieve this, the virtual lens is introduced as an inhomogeneous numerical background for the inverse source problem. This numerical Vesealgo lens is incorporated into the incident and scattered field decomposition, resulting in a new data equation that involves the Veselago lens Green’s function. In addition to the contrast sources within the object-of-interest, the lens introduces virtual contrast sources along the lens boundaries that depend on the total tangential magnetic field. It is shown that a surface integral contribution that takes into account these surface contrast sources must be added to the collected free-space data before one can invert using the well-conditioned Veselago lens inversion operator. A preliminary investigation of the accuracy to which this surface integral contribution must be computed is performed using additive Gaussian noise. Results show that an error of less than one percent is required to achieve imaging performance similar to utilizing an actual Veselago lens. All results are performed within a 2D simulation environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it