Effects of Post-Harvest Processing Methods on the Quality of Radix et Rhizoma Salviae Miltiorrhizae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of pretreatment, drying and storage methods on maintaining the quality of Radix et Rhizoma Salviae mitiorrhzae postharvest was studied. The experiments used organic acids as acid citric and sodium bisulfate solution to evaluate the pretreatment of Radix et Rhizoma Salviae mitiorrhzae. Rhizome and roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge were pretreated and dried by convection drier and heat pump drier and were preserved by low pressure. The results showed that dipping acid citric solution pH 2.5-3 for 30 minutes restricted the developing of total microorganisms. Using heat pump drier were good sensory quality and retaining tanshinone IIA, salvianolic acid content in Radix et Rhizoma Salviae mitiorrhzae. The method of preserving Radix et Rhizoma Salviae mitiorrhzae by the low pressure 200 mmHg, and 400 mmHg after 9 months at ambient temperature (25-30 oC), humidity (80-85%) maintained better quality than the control. Beside, the moisture’s medicine, tanshinone IIA, salvianolic acid content, and total microorganisms in the experiment samples changed slowly during the storage period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".