Identification and quantification of human relaxin proteins by immunoaffinity-mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The human relaxins belong to the Insulin/IGF/Relaxin superfamily of peptide hormones, and their physiological function is primarily associated with reproduction. In this study, we focused on a prostate tissue-specific relaxin RLN1 (REL1_HUMAN protein), and a broader tissue specificity RLN2 (REL2_HUMAN). Due to their structural similarity, REL1 and REL2 proteins were collectively named a ‘human relaxin protein’ in previous studies and were exclusively measured by immunoassays. We hypothesized that the highly selective and sensitive immunoaffinity-selected reaction monitoring (IA-SRM) assays could reveal the identity and concentration of REL1 and REL2 in biological samples and facilitate evaluation of these proteins for diagnostic applications. RT-PCR revealed the high levels of RLN1 and RLN2 transcripts in prostate and breast cancer cell lines. However, no endogenous prorelaxin-1 or mature REL1 were detected by IA-SRM in numerous biological samples. IA-SRM assay of REL2 revealed its undetectable levels (<9 pg/mL) in control female and male sera, relatively high levels of REL2 in maternal sera (median 331 pg/mL, 120 patients), and a biphasic expression of REL2 across the gestational weeks. IA-SRM assays discovered potential cross-reactivity and false-positive measurements for relaxin immunoassays. The developed IA-SRM assays will facilitate investigation of physiological and pathological roles of REL1 and REL2 peptide hormones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".