MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390859276 · doi:10.32388/9ve08b

Review of: "Different methods for obtaining one-dimensional nanoarrays have been mentioned, among them are methods based on lithography (electron beam lithography, optical lithography, electric lithography, ion beam lithography, lithography by scanning microscopes)"

2024· preprint· en· W4390859276 on OpenAlexaff
George Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueQeios · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithographyNext-generation lithographyStencil lithographyX-ray lithographyElectron-beam lithographyComputational lithographyMaskless lithographyExtreme ultraviolet lithographyIon beam lithographyMaterials sciencePhotolithographyNanotechnologyOpticsOptoelectronicsResistPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review of: "Different methods for obtaining one-dimensional nanoarrays have been mentioned, among them are methods based on lithography (electron beam lithography, optical lithography, electric lithography, ion beam lithography, lithography by scanning microscopes)"

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.011
Bibliometrics0.0120.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQeiosSame topicNanofabrication and Lithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207