MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390859406 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.12.574766

Long-Term Potentiation Produces a Sustained Expansion of Synaptic Information Storage Capacity in Adult Rat Hippocampus

2024· preprint· en· W4390859406 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Samavat, Thomas M. Bartol, Cailey Bromer, Dusten D. Hubbard, Dakota C. Hanka, Masaaki Kuwajima, John M. Mendenhall, Patrick Parker, Jared B. Bowden, Wickliffe C. Abraham, Terrence J. Sejnowski, Kristen M. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLong-term potentiationNeuroscienceSynaptic plasticityLTP inductionPerforant pathPerforant PathwayHippocampal formationHippocampusDentate gyrusBiologyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialInhibitory postsynaptic potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Long-term potentiation (LTP) has become a standard model for investigating synaptic mechanisms of learning and memory. Increasingly, it is of interest to understand how LTP affects the synaptic information storage capacity of the targeted population of synapses. Here, structural synaptic plasticity during LTP was explored using three-dimensional reconstruction from serial section electron microscopy. Storage capacity was assessed by applying a new analytical approach, Shannon information theory, to delineate the number of functionally distinguishable synaptic strengths. LTP was induced by delta-burst stimulation of perforant pathway inputs to the middle molecular layer of hippocampal dentate granule cells in adult rats. Spine head volumes were measured as predictors of synaptic strength and compared between LTP and control hemispheres at 30 min and 2 hr after the induction of LTP. Synapses from the same axon onto the same dendrite were used to determine the precision of synaptic plasticity based on the similarity of their physical dimensions. Shannon entropy was measured by exploiting the frequency of spine heads in functionally distinguishable sizes to assess the degree to which LTP altered the number of bits of information storage. Outcomes from these analyses reveal that LTP expanded storage capacity; the distribution of spine head volumes was increased from 2 bits in controls to 3 bits at 30 min and 2.7 bits at 2 hr after the induction of LTP. Furthermore, the distribution of spine head volumes was more uniform across the increased number of functionally distinguishable sizes following LTP, thus achieving more efficient use of coding space across the population of synapses. Significance Establishing relationships between structure, function, and information storage capacity provides a new approach to assessing network strength from structural measurements. Long term potentiation (LTP) is a standard model for investigating synaptic mechanisms of learning and memory. Information is a retrievable quantity that is being stored in synapses as synaptic strength and is correlated with multiple structural components of synaptic strength. Structural synaptic plasticity was measured in 3D reconstructions from serial section electron microscopy of spine head volume, as a proxy for synapse strength, at 30 min and 2 hr after LTP induction. Outcomes indicate that LTP enhances information storage capacity for at least 2 hr by increasing the precision of the synaptic structure and expanding the range of synapse sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→