MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390860700 · doi:10.21015/vtm.v11i1.1419

Development of an Explicit Iterative Numerical Scheme Over the Modified Euler’s Method

2023· article· en· W4390860700 on OpenAlexaff
Tuljaram Meghwar, Prem Kumar, Rahim Bux Khokhar, Asif Ali Shaikh, Evren Hınçal, Muhammad Anwar Solangi

Bibliographic record

VenueVFAST Transactions on Mathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Backward Euler methodEuler's formulaExplicit and implicit methodsOrdinary differential equationIterative methodApplied mathematicsMathematicsEuler methodStability (learning theory)Scheme (mathematics)Numerical analysisNumerical stabilityEuler equationsComputer scienceMathematical analysisDifferential equationMathematical optimizationDifferential algebraic equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main theme of this research paper is to propose an explicit iterative numerical scheme over the modified Euler’s method (MEM) for solving initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. This iterative scheme has been proposed by changing the inner slope of the MEM by the mean of main slope of MEM and slope of explicit forward Euler’s method. The proposed iterative scheme has been tested for its performance by analyzing different numerical factors related to numerical algorithm and found it consistent, more accurate with the order of convergence 2 and it also shows greater stability region as compared to existing methods which are compared with proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVFAST Transactions on MathematicsSame topicHeat Transfer and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207