MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390863857 · doi:10.14479/jkoos.2023.28.4.359

Usefulness of Subjective Refraction Based on Measuring the Far Point of Ametropia

2023· article· en· W4390863857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sung-Jin Oh, Byeong-Yeon Moon, Dong-Sik Yu, Sang-Yeob Kim, Hyun Gug Cho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractionPoint (geometry)OptometryOpticsSubjective refractionGeologyComputer sciencePhysicsMedicineMathematicsGeometryRefractive errorVisual acuity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2009, AMD Alliance International commissioned Access Economics Pty Limited, a world-leading independent economic consulting firm, to conduct a comprehensive study on the worldwide economic and health burdens of visual impairment. Specialists in model-based health forecasting and analysis, Access Economics has previously estimated the burden of vision loss for Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This is the first study to report the burden of visual impairment for all world regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics SocietySame topicSatellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryFrench-language works237,207