MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390882980 · doi:10.1002/nau.25390

Patient reported outcomes of intermittent self‐dilatation after direct vision internal urethrotomy

2024· article· en· W4390882980 on OpenAlexaff
Lukas Scheipner, Doroteja Jankovic, Samra Jasarevic, Matthias D. Seidl, Julia V. Altziebler, Karl Pemberger, Günter Primus, Zhe Tian, Marianne Leitsmann, Sascha Ahyai

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurourology and Urodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeInternational Prostate Symptom ScoreQuality of life (healthcare)Urethral strictureUrethrotomyLower urinary tract symptomsSurgeryProspective cohort studyCohortUrethraPhysical therapyInternal medicineProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose Long‐term results on quality of life (QoL) as well as clinical outcomes of intermittent self‐dilatation (ISD) of the urethra after direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) are scarce. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROs) on voiding symptoms and QoL in a large cohort of urethral stricture patients performing ISD. Methods We identified a total of 121 patients who performed ISD following DVIU between 2008 and 2013. Baseline assessment was conducted for each patient before ISD was started. Follow‐up visits were scheduled in 6‐month intervals. Each assessment included the following questionnaires: International prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life index (IPSS‐QoL), patient global impression of severity (PGI‐S), and patient global impression of improvement (PGI‐I). Additional parameters were maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine, rate of complications, and stricture recurrence. Linear mixed models were used to examine the change over the course of the follow‐up visits to the baseline. Results The median age of the patients was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 43−70). The median follow‐up was 17 months (IQR: 7−30). Mean change from baseline IPSS was −6.1, −5.9, −4.2, and −4.8 points at 6, 24, 36, and 48 months. Mean change from baseline IPSS‐QoL was −1.3, −1.4, −1.6, and −1.8 points, respectively. Mean PGI‐I was 1.7 points at 6, 1.9 points at 24, 1.9 points at 36, and 2.2 points at 48 months after ISD initiation. Mean change of Qmax ranged from 1.7 at 6 to 2.2 mL/s at 48 months. The median complication rate was 3.3% per 6‐month ISD interval. Overall, 11 patients developed stricture recurrence (9%). Conclusion ISD after DVIU had no negative impact on patients' QoL (IPSS‐QoL, PGI‐I, PGI‐S). Urodynamic parameters remained stable for up to 48 months with low complications and an acceptable stricture recurrence rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurourology and UrodynamicsSame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207