Reviews of Books
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IRISH CITIES, edited by Howard B. Clarke. Cork: Mercier Press, 1995.220pp. I R£9.99. ISBN 1-85635-127-0. Reviewed by L.J. PROUDFOOT.SHAPING A CITY: BELFAST IN THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY, by Frederick W. Boal. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, Queen's University. 1995. 127pp. £10.00stg. ISBN 0 85389 605 4. Reviewed by MICHAEL J. BANNON.MORE IRISH COUNTRY TOWNS, edited by Anngret Simms and J.H. Andrews. Cork: Mercier Press, 1995. 206pp. IR£9.99. ISBN 1-85635-121-1. Reviewed by PATRICK J. O'CONNOR.MERCHANTS AND SHOPKEEPERS: A HISTORICAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF AN IRISH MARKET TOWN, 1200–1991, by P.H. Gulliver and Marilyn Silverman. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995.440pp. $(Can)33.50 pb. ISBN 0-8020-7597-5. Reviewed by WILLIAM NOLAN.THE GREAT BOG OF ARDEE, by Frank Mitchell and Breeda Tuite. Reprinted from County Louth Archaeological and Historical Journal, xxiii, No.l (1993). Dundalk: County Louth Archaeological Society, 1995.95pp. IR£4.50. ISBN 0 9521456 1 8. Reviewed by J.H. ANDREWS.THE NEAREST PLACE THAT WASN'T IRELAND: EARLY NINETEENTH-CENTURY LABOR MIGRATION, by Ruth-Ann M.Harris. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1994. 281pp. US$34.95. ISBN 0-8138-1422-7. Reviewed by JIM MAC LAUGHLIN.ROCK FENCES OF THE BEUEGRASS: PERSPECTIVES ON KENTUCKY'S PAST ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE, by Carolyn Murray-Wooley and Karl Raitz. Lexington, Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1992. x+220pp. US$35.00. ISBN 0-8131-1762-3. Reviewed by ARNOLD HORNER.REGIONS IN IRELAND: A STATISTICAL PROFILE, by James A. Walsh. Dublin: Regional Studies Association (Irish Branch), 1995. 107pp. IR£10.00. ISBN 0-9511047 7 2. Reviewed by BARRY BRUNT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.546 | 0.488 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".